til að byrja með er að vera fasisti ekki að vera morðingi, og svona fyrir, fólkið sem hefur aldrei neitt lært í skóla þá var Hitler NASISTI en ekki FASISTI, það er talsvert mikill munur þar á ferð.

Copy/paste af wikipedia: Differences

Cover of a September 1938 Italian magazine, titled La difesa della razza (“The Defence of the Race”). In 1938 the Italian Fascist state made a sudden turn towards anti-Semitism.

Nazism differed from Italian Fascism in the emphasis on the state's purpose in serving its national ideal on the basis of a national race, specifically the social engineering of culture to the ends of the greatest possible prosperity for the Germanic race at the expense of all else and all others. In contrast, Mussolini's Fascism held that cultural factors existed to serve the state, and that it wasn't necessarily in the state's interest to serve or engineer any of these particulars within its sphere. The only purpose of government under Fascism was to uphold the state as supreme above all else, and for these reasons it can be said to have been a governmental statolatry. Where Fascism talked of “State,” however, Nazism spoke of the “Volk” and of the Volksgemeinschaft (the “national community”).

While Nazism saw both party and government as a means to achieve an ideal condition for certain chosen people, fascism was a squarely anti-socialist form of statism that existed as an end in and of itself. The Nazi movement, at least in its overt ideology, spoke of class-based society as the enemy, and wanted to unify the racial element above established classes. The Fascist movement, on the other hand, sought to preserve the class system and uphold it as the foundation of established and desirable culture [citation needed], although this is not to say that Fascists rejected the concept of social mobility. Indeed a central tenet of the Corporate State was meritocracy. However, Fascism also heavily based itself on corporatism, which was supposed to supersede class conflicts.

Mussolini and Hitler weren't always allies. This seemed to be especially the case in 1934 when Engelbert Dollfuss the Austrofascist leader of Austria was assassinated by Nazi Brown shirts on Hitler's orders in preparation for a planned Anschluss, which prompted Mussolini to move troops to the Austrian-Italian border in readiness for war with Hitler. Also when Hitler and Mussolini first met Mussolini referred to Hitler as ‘a silly little monkey’ before he was forced by the Western Allies into an agreement with Hitler.
[edit]

Similarities

Nevertheless, despite these differences, [2]Kevin Passmore (2002 p.62) observes:

There are sufficient similarities between Fascism and Nazism to make it worthwhile applying the concept of fascism to both. In Italy and Germany a movement came to power that sought to create national unity through the repression of national enemies and the incorporation of all classes and both genders into a permanently mobilized nation.

Hitler and Mussolini themselves recognized commonalities in their politics. The second part of Hitler's Mein Kampf, “The National Socialist Movement”, first published in 1926, contains this passage:

I conceived the profoundest admiration for the great man south of the Alps, who, full of ardent love for his people, made no pacts with the enemies of Italy, but strove for their annihilation by all ways and means. What will rank Mussolini among the great men of this earth is his determination not to share Italy with the Marxists, but to destroy internationalism and save the fatherland from it. (p. 622)


Og svo ætla ég svona að bæta við. Spánn var fasistaríki í stríðinu, en samt sem áður var Spánn það hlutlausa land sem var duglegast við að bjarga gyðingum og öðrum minnihlutahópum útaf hernámssvæði þjóðverja(betri heldur en Sviss og Tyrkland), og meira að segja dauglegri heldur en mörg af löndum bandamanna.

Það voru ekki öllu fasistalönd sem veru í “the Axis” t.d. Grikkland, Portúgal og Argentína(ekki beint fasistaríki þarna en mjög skylt).

semsagt með öðrum orðum hippi?